Where there are synergies, however, these are used wherever possible. But as far as specific R&D tactics or strategies to meet customer needs are concerned, these are still inpidual to each pision. We have another open standard for exchanging information.
Allplan vs vectorworks pdf#
As a result, I think our products now have best PDF capabilities around. If you remember, 3 years ago we signed a partnership with Adobe. The teams meet to exchange IFC information and best practices, and work very closely on making sure that there is an open standard for the marketplace.
At the top level we've all agreed on a few key strategies that apply to all the products. Now it's been spun out and is only 20%-owned by Nemetschek - an example of use of the Group's existing R&D reach. The company used to be wholly owned by Nemetschek. For example, we set up an outsourced R&D team in the Nemetschek Bulgaria office immediately after acquisition. There were some synergies at the start, however. There is currently no strategy to, say, shut down the R&D team in Hungary or in the United States, or to merge them at a single location. It's meant as a kind of a melting pot of ideas more than anything else. As far as high-level communication is concerned, twice a year the heads of all the technical teams meet and exchange R&D information. In the case of Vectorworks, the R&D teams have stayed relatively unchanged. It allows its inpidual pisions to take a different strategy to meet customers' needs. One of the strengths of the Nemetschek Group is that it tries to come up with a single solution for every customer and every industry. The brand value, therefore, is pluralism. When they acquire a company – like they did when they acquired us or when they acquired Graphisoft, the company doesn't change from one day to the next. Each one has a different CEO in charge of the strategy for that product line. It therefore has 10 major brand pisions that are operated independently. Would I be right in saying, however, that the cooperation and contact with the other pisions of the Nemetschek Group is closer than ever before?Ĭould you describe the way in which the internal cooperation works?Įssentially the company is organized as a holding-company.
Allplan vs vectorworks software#
Software development and processes have changed over the years. So it's been pretty much 25 years of working with the same technology and customer base that MiniCAD and Vectorworks were selling to. Rich went on to manage the business, and then I took over the R&D teams. I was the original developer, as you know. When we became Nemetschek, I became CTO, so really it was just a title-change rather than a position-change. So MiniCAD 7 subsequently became Vectorworks 8.īefore the acquisition, I was vice-president of engineering.
Shortly before that MiniCAD had been renamed Vectorworks. We were called "Diehl Graphsoft" between 19, and in 2000 the company changed its name from Diehl Graphsoft to Nemetschek North America. the drafting part, to the product.ĭoes that mean you came from Vectorworks and not from the Nemetschek Group?Ĭorrect. Yes, we – Vectorworks – used to be called MiniCAD, and originally it was a 3D Macintosh-only program. You launched the first of the CAD-solutions in 1985. I think our focus on product technology and on customers drives the company forwards.
I have been CEO for 5 years now, and brought with me a really strong product focus. The founder of the company retired 5 years after the company was sold to Nemetschek and I became CEO. We were a very small company, and as the company grew I increasingly acted as product manager and went on to become CTO. I started working on the product in 1985 as one of the original developers, and steadily worked my way up to the product team. I am currently CEO of the Vectorworks brand pision within Nemetschek/Nemetschek North America.
Mr Flaherty, could you please tell us something about yourself and your plans for Vectorworks.